Spiritual Forces

topic posted Fri, June 2, 2006 - 7:41 AM by  Phillip
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
In Gnosticism, there is often a dialogue on Spiritual Forces. While many call Paul the father of Orthodoxy, many Gnostics see him as a Gnostic who got idealistically "kidnapped" by Orthodoxy. Either way, he writes something interesting in Ephesians:

Ephesians 6:12, "12For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms."

I'm curious what thoughtful and wonderfully diverse views our Gnostic community here might have about this passage.
posted by:
Phillip
Sacramento
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: Spiritual Forces

    Fri, June 2, 2006 - 12:44 PM
    Probably astrological forces. I think gthe Gnostics saw the 7 known planets as jailors of the human spirit . the term 'archon' is not a million miles from the meaning of 'petty bueaucrat.' Most modern astrology is just as gnostric nowadys in its intent of transcending the archons, though I do not care for much of what is called modern esotericism in modern astrology.
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: Spiritual Forces

      Fri, June 2, 2006 - 12:45 PM
      These archons would have been as much political forces as personal ones, incidentally.
  • Re: Spiritual Forces

    Fri, June 2, 2006 - 10:17 PM
    A simple answer:

    There are psychological aspects to the concept 'archon' but also political aspects, but also metaphysical aspects, thought-form aspects, etc. Ruling entities/consciousnesses/complexes/tendencies/tempations/gestalts, etc. Both-and more than either-or.

    At risk of sounding too technical...

    The cosmos(harmony/system/order) of chaos (unformed by spirit) kenoma/lack (of spirit), is ruled (by archons)... and is said to be a realm of psyche (soul) where reflected light and counterfeit confuse individual psyche's and conceal light of spirit.

    I think there are so many layers to such ideas. The systems of archons, etc., does parallel the world system of domination as seen i n he Roman Empire, just as such portrayals clearly echoe the stories of Pagan ruling nature deities and planetary deities, and creator gods of various cultures.
    • Re: Spiritual Forces

      Sat, June 3, 2006 - 11:45 AM
      A nice, broad answer for too broad a question, Carl, my question is probably too broad for some more interesting and in-depth explorations. But I think I want to provide an opportunity for a number of different Gnostics' to post their views on the subject and take the subject where they like... I have some directions I might like to go, that I'm familiar with, but there are so many different perspectives represented here, and I'd like to leave room for diverse Gnostic perspectives to get out there before presenting some ideas from my particular tradition.

      There is so much argument on these web sites, as though different perspectives and angles threaten one's own, I feel so many people who have great ideas about Gnosticism get shot down by strange energy and then don't want to post their good ideas as a result! So sad! So I was hoping to leave room for some different views and get a DISCUSSION going, rather than an argument, making room for someone to take the discussion in an angle I perhaps hadn't thought of... this is a BIG teaching in Gnosticism... besides, I've figured out a pretty good method for dealing with trolls (hehe).
  • Re: Spiritual Forces

    Sat, June 3, 2006 - 12:59 PM
    To take an off-the cuff stab at the remark, I'd say that it shows that Paul hadn't figured out how to differentiate the various aspects of the divine. To associate evil forces with heaven rather than hell is to confuse two different eternal domains.

    As for gnostic aspects to Paul's writing, it could not be helped. Everyone is a gnostic practitioner to some extent. It's a matter of level and degree.
    • Re: Spiritual Forces

      Sat, June 3, 2006 - 5:35 PM
      Your point is well taken. But I wonder if the opposite is true... Paul is quite enigmatic. For instance, in the "Origin of the World" there is a distinction made between the Heavens of Chaos, and of the Heavens of the Pleuroma of Light... so, hmmm... quite enigmatic!
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: Spiritual Forces

      Sun, June 4, 2006 - 12:36 AM
      'To take an off-the cuff stab at the remark, I'd say that it shows that Paul hadn't figured out how to differentiate the various aspects of the divine. To associate evil forces with heaven rather than hell is to confuse two different eternal domains. '

      Have to admit Sophia, I am still convinced that Paul meant the 7 planets in the heavens. I do not have Ean Begg's book on The Blavk Goddess, but he starts off with the Sun as Yaoldobaoth, the ego complex, that drowns out the voices of other planets, the moon as the pendulum of growth then entropy, Mercuy where we enslaved by thoughts, Venus by our lust, and so on.

      And incidentally, Gandy and Frek eraised this, what on earth was going on do you suppose whern Paul says he 'ascended to the 3rd heaven?'

      Dante uses the 7 planet is his heaven and hell too and there too, the planets each have a corresponding 'sin' that traps the ascending spul, as well as - luckily - a virtue. So here the archons are two-faced, gifts as much as limitations. Maybe the archons are only archons from one point of view.

      Another writer I really liked was Jogn Michell. I do not inow where he got his ideas from and I wish he had put bibliograghies at the end of his books. He ferlt that it was vital not just on a personal level but on a political level to integrate, or keep integrated, the sun and moon principles especially.
      • Re: Spiritual Forces

        Sun, June 4, 2006 - 9:33 AM
        Well, I'm not going to knock different perspectives about Paul, certainly there are some things that Paul says that don't necessarily sound as enlightened as other things. But our tradition teaches that the forces of the Archons DO establish heirarchies in apparently "heavenly" places. Also, our tradition teaches that enlightenment is distinctly NOT heaven. But then, different traditions will use this term "Heaven" differently, so let me define the term as we teach it.

        Consider Orthodoxy's idea of heaven. It is akin to a "Gated Community of the Sky." Its where all one's needs are met, all ones worldly desires are satisfied forever, but on a more subtle plane. You get there through mindless obedience to this "God". We would not deny that there are such realms or worlds, and we would even call them a "heaven", for it is distinctly not a hell realm, but are they the Pleuroma of light? You see, we make a distinction between the realms of Eternity and the realms of "Forever." Forever is "for all time" in our tradition. But within all time there is a beginning and an end. Eternity is eternal. Beyond time, yet within time, simultenously. Everywhere and nowhere simultaneously. We simply see these "heavens" as another very subtle trick of the Archons... but perhaps others would not call these "heavens"... and I agree that the seven planets can be attributed to them, just as there are seven "heavens", seven "earths" and so on according to Zohar... but where is the Pleuroma of Light becomes the question, and is there a distinction between these terms... in our tradition, we make a distinction... but I'm not about to knock a tradition or view that doesn't... terms are just that, terms :-).
      • Re: Spiritual Forces

        Sun, June 4, 2006 - 3:35 PM
        Lynda,

        There is a difference between the visible "heaven" of the astral domain and the invisible "heaven" of the spiritual domain. Many of the celestial names in the physical world are projections from the spiritual domain.

        Traditionally, an actual physically existing entity on Earth had been projected onto the lights in the sky by subsequent generations. For example, Saturn was originally an earthly political player (a "king" of sorts) who conferred the benefits of orchard cultivation on humanity. For that, one of the visible celestial lights was associated with his memory.

        Aside from the physical Sun, there is an invisible Sun that serves a role in the spiritual domain that the visible Sun serves in the physical domain. It is a source of spiritual life. It's shadows can be perceived by the "enlightened" observer. And so forth.
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: Spiritual Forces

          Mon, June 5, 2006 - 10:27 AM
          Sophia, I was trying to say that it did depend on what kind of dimension, or area of reality, we were talking about. I personally still prefer the perspective I found in writers like Ean Begg and John Michell, for me there is balance there which guards against any fanaticism.

Recent topics in "Gnostic Way"